Rebuilding Industry for the World We Actually Live In
- Branko Milikić
- May 12
- 4 min read
Everyone agrees that we need to reindustrialize - politicians, economists, even startups that have never stepped foot in a factory. It’s no longer up for debate.
Supply chains have collapsed more than once. Energy systems are vulnerable. Productivity growth has been stagnant. And in both Europe and North America, the message is clear: we need more control over what we produce, how we produce it, and where it happens.
Governments are pushing for industrial sovereignty. Incentives are rolling out. Policies are shifting. But the risk is that we try to rebuild industry using the same logic that made it fragile in the first place.
The question isn’t if we rebuild. It’s how. And whether we’re building for the world we live in now, or for the one we left behind.
Reindustrialization Needs More Than Machines
Restarting factories is the easy part. What we’re really talking about is rebuilding our industrial base with intelligence built in from day one. That means processes that are adaptive, systems that are connected, decisions that are based on live data, not monthly reports or gut feeling.
You can’t do that with the old model: spreadsheets, manual tracking, siloed departments, six-month delays between seeing a problem and doing something about it. That model is why we’re reindustrializing in the first place.
If reindustrialization doesn’t include a modern digital layer - one that gives you visibility, traceability, and control across the board - nothing we rebuild will scale. And worse, it won’t last.
What This Actually Means for Companies
Reindustrialization doesn’t mean romanticizing heavy industry or trying to bring back old job numbers. It means building smarter, more resilient value chains - ones that can absorb energy shocks, geopolitical friction, resource shortages - and still deliver consistently.
To make that happen, we need to stop thinking of IT as an afterthought or a separate initiative. It has to be part of the production system itself. Not a digital twin as a side project, but the backbone: powering how we monitor assets, schedule maintenance, manage consumption, and respond to incidents in real time.
And this is where a lot of well-funded transformation programs fall apart. They over-engineer the strategy, but forget the operator. They buy platforms with endless dashboards, but no integration. They move everything to the cloud, then realize they can’t run when the network’s down or the pricing model changes.
Here’s the irony: most companies already have the core systems they need: PLCs, SCADA, MES, ERP. The issue isn’t hardware or infrastructure. It’s coherence. The lack of a layer that connects everything, contextualizes data, and automates what can (and should) be automated.
Think of it like this: You wouldn’t build a factory without electricity. In 2025, you shouldn’t run one without real-time data and adaptive control either.
What That Layer Needs to Look Like
It doesn’t need to be flashy. But it does need to work. Consistently, reliably, securely, and in a way that fits how industrial environments actually function, not how someone imagines them in a slide deck.
Here’s what that means in practice:
Plug into what you already have without forcing a ground-up rebuild.
Be stable and safe to update, not something that introduces risk every time you roll out a change.
Support real-world deployment needs (on-prem, edge, or hybrid) depending on site requirements, not some vendor’s preferred architecture.
Make data useful across teams (operations, maintenance, energy, quality), not just locked in IT systems.
Give operators tools they can actually use, not more dashboards that no one has time to check.
Treat AI as a practical tool, not magic - there to support decisions, not require a team of specialists to keep it running.
Respect the expertise already on the floor: the people who know when something’s off just by how it sounds.
And let’s be clear, the goal isn’t to replace operators. It’s to amplify the experience they’ve built over decades, and make sure that knowledge becomes part of how the system works, not something you lose when someone retires.
That’s what separates yet another failed “digital transformation” from a business that’s actually more efficient, more resilient, and ready for what comes next.
Where WolkAbout Fits In
This is the kind of layer we’ve been building at WolkAbout. We've spent years working with manufacturers, energy providers, and oil & gas companies - industries where uptime matters, margins are tight, and decisions need to be made fast.
Our product, WolkAbout AIrport, is an industrial-grade enabler built to make Industry 4.0 actually work in practice (not just in strategy slides). It helps companies:
Pull data from any system, machine, or sensor without replacing what already works.
Clean, structure, and connect that data so it’s usable across operations, maintenance, energy, and quality.
Apply AI where it solves real problems, like preventing downtime, cutting waste, or speeding up response.
Base decisions based on what’s happening right now, not what someone reported last week
Scale across multiple sites without creating a patchwork of systems or unpredictable cloud costs.
We’re not here to pitch AI. The goal is to give teams the tools they need to run operations better, so businesses can grow, automate what makes sense, and stay competitive in a world that’s already moved on.
Final Thought
Reindustrialization isn’t a concept we need to sell. The need is obvious. What matters now is how we make it real without wasting time, money, or momentum.
We’ve been in this space long enough to know what doesn’t work. We’ve seen the databases that don’t scale, the architectures that fall apart in production, the tools that look good in demos but add zero value on the floor. We’ve been through the cycles—custom builds, cloud-first everything, overly complex platforms—and we’ve learned what sticks and what doesn’t.
Getting it right takes systems that work across the floor, not just across a presentation. It takes partners who understand the complexity, and don’t add more of it.
If that’s the direction you’re headed, we’d be glad to connect. No pitch, just a conversation grounded in what actually works. Let’s talk.
Comments